They provide the potential for the solution to all the problems faced by the planet, and equally for The Destruction of Reason.
This is a brilliant intellectual history of the philosophical positions and movements that in a way fermented to produce National Socialism. Rare erudition, wonderful stylizations, Lukasc is an ama Exploring Marx's Capital. This volume, originally published in French, offers a new interpretation of Marx's great work.
By exploring the work as a step in a process of theoretical development, Jacques Bidet re-assesses Mar Late Marx and the Russian Road. Late Marx and the Russian Road addresses in a new way Marx's attitudes to societies we describe today as 'developing' or 'peripheral' and to social and socialist theories which originated Lenin's role in captures a unique revolutionary moment. Lenin's entire corpus of writings in the eight months between the two revolutions offers a concrete lesson on the theor The Law of Worldwide Value.
In his new extensively revised and expanded edition of this book, Samir Amin suggests new approaches to Marxian analysis of the crisis of the late capitalist system of generalized, financialized, a Between and , the economic and political map of the world was altered decisively. The basis was created for the first experiments for establishing an egalitarian social order.
Prolonged an A World to Win. It has been more influential in the making of the modern world than any other piece of political writing. Rarely has call to arms been phrased in a language of such zest, beauty and purity. One hun The Soviet Woman.
Alexandra Kollontai. The revolutionary legacy of Alexandra Kollontai has slipped into relative obscurity. This is somewhat surprising, because she was a voluminous writer — on politics, Marxist theory Shopping Cart My Cart -. Language INR. Home The Dialectical Biologist. The Dialectical Biologist explores this political nature of scientific inquiry, advancing its argument within the framework of Marxist dialectic. These essays stress the concepts of continual change and co Scientists act within a social context and from a philosophical perspective that is inherently political.
These essays stress the concepts of continual change and codetermination between organism and environment, part and whole, structure and process, science and politics. Throughout, this book questions our accepted definitions and biases, showing the self-reflective nature of scientific activity within society. Get A Copy. Paperback , pages. More Details Original Title. Other Editions 2. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
To ask other readers questions about The Dialectical Biologist , please sign up. Be the first to ask a question about The Dialectical Biologist. Lists with This Book.
Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Jun 04, Philipp rated it really liked it Shelves: biology , marxism. This book was published a year before I was born.
Since then, I've jumped through most of the hoops society has laid out for budding scientists, and at some point in the next 2 years I should be allowed to call myself a "Doctor of Philosophy" or something like that "burger flipper"? It has come obvious to me that there's a ton of problems in scientific research, in the scientific community, and in the way research is conducted. It's also very funny to see that a lot of these problems have alr This book was published a year before I was born.
It's also very funny to see that a lot of these problems have already been described in this book from 27 years ago. Basically, it's a collection of essays in the style of Marxist dialectics, i. I'm pretty sure Dialectics has been re-invented as Systems Thinking in recent years by writers like Donna Meadows, even the way the graphs work is mostly identical.
It couldn't have been proposed in a stale, "God-given" medieval society. However, just because yield grew doesn't mean that Lysenkoism was good - there could have been millions of reasons why that happened.
There's a lot in there you've heard before. Analyzing the entire system at once makes things only "worse", so to speak. The statistical tools we now have developed for these "simple" interactions are already so complicated that I shudder to think what "proper" modelling of a complex system needs. Definitely no "pop science" material! Anyway, if you're a biologist and you want a very different view on your science, go for it. Similar goes for the interested layman.
If, however, you're looking for a fun book you can read on your commute, stay away, for that it's too dry. View 2 comments. Oct 02, laura rated it really liked it Shelves: philosophy , fact. A superb collection of rare, unpublished, or hard-to-access essays from Levins and Lewontin, mostly from the s.
Various topics- healthcare, evolution, ecology, statistical analysis, agriculture, and the practise of science itself is analysed from a Marxist-inspired dialectical account. The hodge-podge nature of the book means the structure is quite loose, though this affords dipping in and out, or skipping difficult parts such as the rare application of calculus or technical terminology uni A superb collection of rare, unpublished, or hard-to-access essays from Levins and Lewontin, mostly from the s.
The hodge-podge nature of the book means the structure is quite loose, though this affords dipping in and out, or skipping difficult parts such as the rare application of calculus or technical terminology unique to biology. The dialectical approach is a way of analysing the relationship between parts and wholes. The struggle between parts e. Change is made when the struggle reaches a breaking point, and the struggle continues albeit in a new form. In this way, both change and stability, individual and context, can be understood in a way that undermines their false dichotomy.
Therefore, dialectics can be used to understand the movement of any dynamical system- atoms, ecosystems, or human society. Levins and Lewontin do not hide their political affiliation, they merely make explicit that which other scientists and writers conceal. They are Marxists, and this perspective informs their biology as it does their life in other regards, just as the ideology of other scientists informs their work and life too. However, this perspective is not merely a flavour among others- as the authors show, Marxism enables them to ask questions biology is notably ill-equipped to answer, and avoids for the most part.
Such mechanistic, reductionist science is perfectly suited to the ruling-class ideology. Likewise at the species level, constraints are seen as being placed on species that must either adapt to their environments or perish.
A rigid natural order is presumed to exist in this doubly ahistorical universe that narrowly delimits the roles played by living things, including human beings, in their own evolution, and in the evolution of their natural environments. In The Dialectical Biologist , Levins and Lewontin reject one-sided notions of mechanical reductionism and superorganic holism common in ecology and the hierarchical conceptions of life and the universe that they both generate.
In presenting their approach, they critique both idealism and reductionism within the natural sciences. The universe is one of change due to existing and evolving contradictions, which force transformation in the conditions of the world. A dialectical relationship exists between a subject, such as an organism, or even human society, and the environment. They exist as one in tension , given that an organism is part of nature.
Darwin downplayed but did not deny the importance of the constraints placed on evolutionary change due to the structured nature of the ontogeny individual development of organisms, which potentially restricts the types of changes organisms can undergo in their phylogeny evolutionary history.
He elevated the conditions of existence—external environmental forces—to primacy in explaining evolution, so as to establish natural selection, not the final ends of natural theology, as the dominant force behind the transformation of species. Yet in so doing, he established a view of natural history as predominantly one-sided—i. Darwin recognized that variation is an internal process, in which causes external to organisms did not determine how things turned out.